In re Walsh
71 P. 1132, 26 Mont. 562, 1902 Mont. LEXIS 77
Opinion
Upon examination of the judgment of the district court whereby the petitioners were found guilty of contempt, and in pursuance of which they were committed to the custody of the sheriff of Silver’ Bow county, the court finds that the same is void, in that the said judgment, being’ as for a contempt in the joresence of the court, does not recite any fact showing that a contempt had been committed: It is therefore ordered that the judgment be annulled; that the petitioners be discharged from custody, and that their bail be exonerated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Walsh, 71 P. 1132, 26 Mont. 562, 1902 Mont. LEXIS 77 (Mo. 1902).
71 P. 1132 (In re Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dunlavey v. Doggett
99 P. 436 (Montana Supreme Court, 1909)