In re Walsh

Montana Supreme Court

In re Walsh

71 P. 1132, 26 Mont. 562, 1902 Mont. LEXIS 77

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 29, 1902

DocketNo. 1,821

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 P. 1132 (In re Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Walsh, 71 P. 1132, 26 Mont. 562, 1902 Mont. LEXIS 77 (Mo. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the judgment of the district court whereby the petitioners were found guilty of contempt, and in pursuance of which they were committed to the custody of the sheriff of Silver’ Bow county, the court finds that the same is void, in that the said judgment, being’ as for a contempt in the joresence of the court, does not recite any fact showing that a contempt had been committed: It is therefore ordered that the judgment be annulled; that the petitioners be discharged from custody, and that their bail be exonerated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the judgment of the district court whereby the petitioners were found guilty of contempt, and in pursuance of which they were committed to the custody of the sheriff of Silver’ Bow county, the court finds that the same is void, in that the said judgment, being’ as for a contempt in the joresence of the court, does not recite any fact showing that a contempt had been committed: It is therefore ordered that the judgment be annulled; that the petitioners be discharged from custody, and that their bail be exonerated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 P. 1132, 26 Mont. 562, 1902 Mont. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-walsh-mont-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack