In Re Wallace

695 S.E.2d 23, 287 Ga. 157, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 1532, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 374
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 3, 2010
DocketS10Y0771
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 695 S.E.2d 23 (In Re Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Wallace, 695 S.E.2d 23, 287 Ga. 157, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 1532, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 374 (Ga. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Michael B. Wallace’s petition for voluntary discipline, in which he agrees to a sanction ranging from a Review Panel reprimand to a 60-day suspension. Wallace admits that in connection with representation of a client, his actions led to him and the client failing to appear at a scheduled hearing. He further admits that after his client obtained new counsel, he misrepresented to her new counsel the cause of missing the hearing. He admits that by these actions he has violated Rules 1.3 and 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d).

The State Bar recommends that the Court accept the petition and impose a Review Panel reprimand, noting in mitigation that Wallace made a timely good faith effort to rectify the consequences of his misconduct; he did not present false information to the court or in writing; and he has shown a cooperative attitude toward the disciplinary proceedings. However, the State Bar has also shown in aggravation that Wallace has twice been the subject of disciplinary sanctions: in 2007 he received a formal letter of admonition and in 2009 he received an Investigative Panel reprimand.

Having reviewed the record, we conclude that in light of Wallace’s prior disciplinary history, a 60-day suspension is the appropriate sanction in this case. Therefore, we hereby accept Wallace’s petition and order that Michael B. Wallace be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days, effective as of the date of this opinion. Wallace is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Sixty-day suspension.

All the Justices concur. *158 Decided May 3, 2010. Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Rebecca A. Hall, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Sakas
799 S.E.2d 157 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)
In the Matter of Jeffrey L. Sakas
Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 S.E.2d 23, 287 Ga. 157, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 1532, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wallace-ga-2010.