In re Walker

601 N.E.2d 327, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 280, 1992 WL 230643
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided September 11, 1992·No. No. 20S00-9006-DI-405·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER AMENDING DATE OF SANCTION

Comes now the Respondent in this proceeding, Max K. Walker, Jr., and requests that the previously imposed disciplinary sanction of a sixty day suspension from the practice of law be amended or that, in the alternative, the date of suspension commence on September 14, 1992.

Upon examination of this matter, this Court reaffirms its decision to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law for a period of sixty days, but finds that such suspension should commence on September 14, 1992.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by this Court that our opinion of August 21, 1992, 597 N.E.2d 1271, suspending Respondent from the practice of law for a period of sixty (60) days is amended to provide that such suspension shall commence on September 14, 1992.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, to the Respondent, and all parties who received the initial order of suspension.

GIVAN, DICKSON, and KRAHULIK, JJ., approve this order. SHEPARD, C.J., and DeBRULER, J., dissent and would deny relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Walker, 601 N.E.2d 327, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 280, 1992 WL 230643 (Ind. 1992).

601 N.E.2d 327 (In re Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Hurst
871 N.E.2d 968 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2007)