In re Walker

601 N.E.2d 327, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 280, 1992 WL 230643
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 11, 1992
DocketNo. 20S00-9006-DI-405
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 601 N.E.2d 327 (In re Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Walker, 601 N.E.2d 327, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 280, 1992 WL 230643 (Ind. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER AMENDING DATE OF SANCTION

Comes now the Respondent in this proceeding, Max K. Walker, Jr., and requests that the previously imposed disciplinary sanction of a sixty day suspension from the practice of law be amended or that, in the alternative, the date of suspension commence on September 14, 1992.

Upon examination of this matter, this Court reaffirms its decision to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law for a period of sixty days, but finds that such suspension should commence on September 14, 1992.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by this Court that our opinion of August 21, 1992, 597 N.E.2d 1271, suspending Respondent from the practice of law for a period of sixty (60) days is amended to provide that such suspension shall commence on September 14, 1992.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, to the Respondent, and all parties who received the initial order of suspension.

GIVAN, DICKSON, and KRAHULIK, JJ., approve this order. SHEPARD, C.J., and DeBRULER, J., dissent and would deny relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Hurst
871 N.E.2d 968 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
601 N.E.2d 327, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 280, 1992 WL 230643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-walker-ind-1992.