In re Walker

103 F. App'x 745
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 3, 2004
DocketNo. 04-6789
StatusPublished

This text of 103 F. App'x 745 (In re Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Walker, 103 F. App'x 745 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ivey Walker petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on a petition that he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F. App'x 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-walker-ca4-2004.