In re Walentynowicz

253 A.D.2d 150, 689 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3122

This text of 253 A.D.2d 150 (In re Walentynowicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Walentynowicz, 253 A.D.2d 150, 689 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on November 2, 1955, and maintains an office in Buffalo. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with neglecting legal matters and other acts of professional misconduct.

Respondent has admitted the allegations in the petition and expressed remorse for his misconduct. We note that, during [151]*151the period when the misconduct occurred, respondent was suffering from serious health problems. Accordingly, we conclude that respondent should be censured.

Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Order of censure entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D.2d 150, 689 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-walentynowicz-nyappdiv-1999.