In re Waldman

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Waldman

399 S.E.2d 71, 260 Ga. 525, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 416

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 8, 1990

DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 820

StatusPublished

This text of 399 S.E.2d 71 (In re Waldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Waldman, 399 S.E.2d 71, 260 Ga. 525, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 416 (Ga. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

Respondent Herbert S. Waldman has petitioned the State Disciplinary Board for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law on the ground of his conviction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia of three felonies involving moral turpitude and constituting grounds for disbarment under Standard 66 of Rule 4-102 of Part IV, Chapter 1 of the State Bar Rules.

Pursuant to State Bar Rule 4-106, a lawyer convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude may be suspended from the practice of law until all appeal rights are terminated. The court, pursuant to State Bar Rule 4-106 and upon the recommendation of the special master, accepts Mr. Waldman’s petition for voluntary suspension from the practice of law pending termination of his appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Voluntary suspension of license is accepted.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Respondent Herbert S. Waldman has petitioned the State Disciplinary Board for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law on the ground of his conviction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia of three felonies involving moral turpitude and constituting grounds for disbarment under Standard 66 of Rule 4-102 of Part IV, Chapter 1 of the State Bar Rules.

Pursuant to State Bar Rule 4-106, a lawyer convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude may be suspended from the practice of law until all appeal rights are terminated. The court, pursuant to State Bar Rule 4-106 and upon the recommendation of the special master, accepts Mr. Waldman’s petition for voluntary suspension from the practice of law pending termination of his appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Voluntary suspension of license is accepted.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

399 S.E.2d 71, 260 Ga. 525, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-waldman-ga-1990.