in Re Walata Deon Smith
This text of in Re Walata Deon Smith (in Re Walata Deon Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-12-00164-CV ____________
IN RE WALATA DEON SMITH, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 21, 2012, relator, Walata Deon Smith, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Relator asks this court to compel Stan Stanart, the County Clerk of Harris County, Texas, to forward copies of probate court records.
This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals’ district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. Because the petition for writ of mandamus is directed toward a county clerk and is not necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction, we have no jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b)(1).
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Jamison.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Walata Deon Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-walata-deon-smith-texapp-2012.