In re Wager

6 Paige Ch. 11, 1836 N.Y. LEXIS 205, 1836 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 78
New York Court of Chancery·Decided February 1, 1836·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor

decided that it was the duty of the sheriff, in such cases, to select and summon such jurors as he thought proper, and who were indifferent in relation to the matter; that the commissioners were only authorized to decide upon the validity of challenges to jurors so selected; and that it was irregular and improper for them to dictate to the sheriff what jurors should be summoned in the first instance. For this irregularity, the proceedings were ordered to be set aside ; and a new commission was directed to be issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wager, 6 Paige Ch. 11, 1836 N.Y. LEXIS 205, 1836 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 78 (N.Y. 1836).

6 Paige Ch. 11 (In re Wager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Klock
3 N.Y.S. 478 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Cutter v. Griswold
1 Walk. Ch. 437 (Michigan Court of Chancery, 1844)