In re Wadespearman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Wadespearman

825 A.2d 1138, 176 N.J. 509

DecidedJune 25, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 825 A.2d 1138 (In re Wadespearman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wadespearman, 825 A.2d 1138, 176 N.J. 509 (N.J. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having issued a letter of admonition in DRB 02-461 to SHARON WADE-SPEARMAN of IRVINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, for violating RPC 3.3(a)(1) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact to a tribunal);

And respondent having been ordered to show cause why she should not be disciplined as provided for in Rule D20-15A;

And the Court having determined from its review of the record that the appropriate discipline is a reprimand;

And good cause appearing;

[510]*510It is ORDERED that the admonition issued by the Disciplinary Review Board is vacated and SHARON WADE-SPEARMAN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI