Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re Wade F.

In re Wade F.

402 N.E.2d 1164, 49 N.Y.2d 730, 426 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2098
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 1980·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The position appellant Wade F. took in relation to the complaining witness, the fact that the latter was confined between the three boys and a car, the time at which Wade took up his position in relation to Christopher’s threatened use of the razor, the concerted movement of the three boys away from the scene were sufficient to sustain the finding that Wade participated in an act which if committed by an adult would constitute robbery in the first degree.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memoranda.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wade F., 402 N.E.2d 1164, 49 N.Y.2d 730, 426 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2098 (N.Y. 1980).

402 N.E.2d 1164 (In re Wade F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of F.
49 N.Y.2d 730 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)