In re Wade F.
This text of 402 N.E.2d 1164 (In re Wade F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The position appellant Wade F. took in relation to the complaining witness, the fact that the latter was confined between the three boys and a car, the time at which Wade took up his position in relation to Christopher’s threatened use of the razor, the concerted movement of the three boys away from the scene were sufficient to sustain the finding that Wade participated in an act which if committed by an adult would constitute robbery in the first degree.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memoranda.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
402 N.E.2d 1164, 49 N.Y.2d 730, 426 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wade-f-ny-1980.