In re Wackowski

176 A.3d 785, 231 N.J. 446
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 11, 2018·No. D–190 September Term 2016; 079713·Published

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-034, concluding on the record certified to the **447Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent) that WILLIAM E. WACKOWSKI of POINT PLEASANT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM E. WACKOWSKI is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wackowski, 176 A.3d 785, 231 N.J. 446 (N.J. 2018).

176 A.3d 785 (In re Wackowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.