In re W. J. Schmidt & Co.
This text of 165 F. 1006 (In re W. J. Schmidt & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no need to discuss the constitutional questions which have been argued. We are satisfied that the language used by Congress in the sixty-seventh section of the bankrupt act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 565 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3450]), providing that levies under judgment within the period named “shall be deemed null and void’’ was not intended to deprive state’s officer of his statutory fees, accruing prior to bankruptcy, under proceedings in the state courts, which were in all respects regular and in accordance with the state law and practice. The order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 F. 1006, 91 C.C.A. 665, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-w-j-schmidt-co-ca2-1908.