in Re: W & F Transportation, Inc., E.H. Wilhelm, Sr. and Margaret D. Wilhelm D/B/A W & F Transportation
This text of in Re: W & F Transportation, Inc., E.H. Wilhelm, Sr. and Margaret D. Wilhelm D/B/A W & F Transportation (in Re: W & F Transportation, Inc., E.H. Wilhelm, Sr. and Margaret D. Wilhelm D/B/A W & F Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-01380-CV
IN RE W& F TRANSPORTATION, INC., E.H. WILHELM, SR., and
MARGARET D. WILHELM d/b/a W & F TRANSPORTATION, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On December 17, 2003, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In their petition, relators seek to compel the Hon. R. Jack Cagle, presiding judge of Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 1, to set aside his turnover order and order appointing a receiver entered September 25, 2003, in cause number 750,292, styled Cindy and Ricky Wilhelm v. W & F Transportation, Inc., E.H. Wilhelm, Sr., and Margaret D. Wilhelm d/b/a W & F Transportation.
Relators failed to establish the absence of an adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 30, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.