In re Von Wiegen

297 A.D.2d 838, 746 N.Y.2d 847, 746 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8323

This text of 297 A.D.2d 838 (In re Von Wiegen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Von Wiegen, 297 A.D.2d 838, 746 N.Y.2d 847, 746 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—Per Curiam.

Because we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law {see 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]), we deny the application for reinstatement.

[839]*839Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application for reinstatement is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 838, 746 N.Y.2d 847, 746 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-von-wiegen-nyappdiv-2002.