In re Vogel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Vogel

251 A.D. 257, 296 N.Y.S. 297, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6905

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent has been shown to have been guilty of sharp practice as an attorney, of dishonorable conduct in several matters, especially in evading his obligation to pay for a chattel purchased under a contract of conditional sale, and of giving false testimony in connection therewith in supplementary proceedings. He should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent has been shown to have been guilty of sharp practice as an attorney, of dishonorable conduct in several matters, especially in evading his obligation to pay for a chattel purchased under a contract of conditional sale, and of giving false testimony in connection therewith in supplementary proceedings. He should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

In re Vogel, 251 A.D. 257, 296 N.Y.S. 297, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

251 A.D. 257 (In re Vogel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.