in Re V.O. Carden, Jr.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00154-CV
IN RE V.O. CARDEN Jr.
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 9, 2014
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On March 6, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial
court’s partial denial of a motion to sever and abate claims filed against relator. The court has
considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, along with the record and responses filed on
behalf of the real parties in interest, and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief
sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13-0700176CVL, styled Brett Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe and Mamba Minerals, LLC v. Double Eagle Development, LLC and Tidal Petroleum, Inc., pending in the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas, the Honorable Donna S. Rayes presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re V.O. Carden, Jr. (in Re V.O. Carden, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.