in Re V.O. Carden, Jr.
This text of in Re V.O. Carden, Jr. (in Re V.O. Carden, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
In re V.O. Carden, Jr.Appellant/s
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 7, 2014
No. 04-14-00154-CV
IN RE V.O. CARDEN Jr.
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
On March 6, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than March 21, 2014. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
It is so ORDERED on March 7th, 2014. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13-0700176CVL, styled Brett Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe and Mamba Minerals, LLC v. Double Eagle Development, LLC and Tidal Petroleum, Inc., pending in the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas, the Honorable Donna S. Rayes presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re V.O. Carden, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vo-carden-jr-texapp-2014.