In re V.M.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re V.M.

113 Ohio St. 3d 161

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 4, 2007

DocketNo. 2006-1905

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 Ohio St. 3d 161 (In re V.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re V.M., 113 Ohio St. 3d 161 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re C.F., 113 Ohio St.3d 73, 2007-Ohio-1104, 862 N.E.2d 816.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissent in In re C.F., 113 Ohio St.3d 73, 2007-Ohio-1104, 862 N.E.2d 816. Yeura R. Venters, Franklin County Public Defender, and David L. Strait, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re C.F., 113 Ohio St.3d 73, 2007-Ohio-1104, 862 N.E.2d 816.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissent in In re C.F., 113 Ohio St.3d 73, 2007-Ohio-1104, 862 N.E.2d 816. Yeura R. Venters, Franklin County Public Defender, and David L. Strait, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 Ohio St. 3d 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vm-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack