Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Vivino

In re Vivino

217 A.D.2d 466, 630 N.Y.S.2d 489, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8049
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 1995·Published

Opinion

Petitioner’s motion is granted, and petitioner shall be reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his submission of written proof that he has attended and completed a recognized New York Bar Review course and upon the further order of this Court. No opinion. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Vivino, 217 A.D.2d 466, 630 N.Y.S.2d 489, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8049 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

217 A.D.2d 466 (In re Vivino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.