In re Viveros

88 P.3d 1232, 277 Kan. 657
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJuly 1, 2004
DocketBar Docket No. 12268
StatusPublished

This text of 88 P.3d 1232 (In re Viveros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Viveros, 88 P.3d 1232, 277 Kan. 657 (kan 2004).

Opinion

In a letter signed April 21, 2004, to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Octavio J. Viveros, Jr., an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the State of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2003 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 281).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a formal complaint had been filed in which it was alleged that the respondent had misappropriated several thousand dollars of his client’s funds and engaged in dishonest conduct.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Octavio J. Viveros, Jr., be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Octavio J. Viveros, Jr., from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs therein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2003 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 286).

Dated this 27th day of April, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 P.3d 1232, 277 Kan. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-viveros-kan-2004.