In re Viti

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Viti

429 S.E.2d 525, 263 Ga. 129, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1878, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 414

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 17, 1993·No. S93Y0852·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

Richard A. Viti has petitioned for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law pending appeal. He admits that he was convicted in federal court of two felony counts involving income tax evasion. He further admits that his conviction constitutes a violation of Standard 66 of State Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The special master recommends that we accept Viti’s petition and suspend his license to practice law pending termination of the appéal of his conviction. We adopt the special master’s recommendation and grant the petition for voluntary suspension pending appeal.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Richard A. Viti has petitioned for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law pending appeal. He admits that he was convicted in federal court of two felony counts involving income tax evasion. He further admits that his conviction constitutes a violation of Standard 66 of State Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The special master recommends that we accept Viti’s petition and suspend his license to practice law pending termination of the appéal of his conviction. We adopt the special master’s recommendation and grant the petition for voluntary suspension pending appeal.

All the Justices concur.

In re Viti, 429 S.E.2d 525, 263 Ga. 129, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1878, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 414 (Ga. 1993).

Pincite

429 S.E.2d 525 (In re Viti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related