In re Vitale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Vitale

166 A.D.2d 864, 563 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12790

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 25, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.D.2d 864 (In re Vitale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Vitale, 166 A.D.2d 864, 563 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 22, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The evidence before the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board clearly established that claimant left her employment because her earnings did not meet her expectations. However, dissatisfaction with wages does not constitute a good cause for leaving one’s employment (see, Matter of Weber [Catherwood], 32 AD2d 697) and, therefore, claimant is not entitled to unemployment insurance benefits. Since the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, it must be upheld (see, Matter of Fontana [Levine], 53 AD2d 742).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 22, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The evidence before the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board clearly established that claimant left her employment because her earnings did not meet her expectations. However, dissatisfaction with wages does not constitute a good cause for leaving one’s employment (see, Matter of Weber [Catherwood], 32 AD2d 697) and, therefore, claimant is not entitled to unemployment insurance benefits. Since the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, it must be upheld (see, Matter of Fontana [Levine], 53 AD2d 742).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D.2d 864, 563 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vitale-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack