In Re Visitation of Troxel
954 P.2d 289, 1998 WL 168919
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Visitation of Troxel. Read the opinion of the Court — 971 P.2d 56 →
Opinion
In re VISITATION OF Natalie Anne TROXEL, Isabelle Rose Troxel, Minors.
Jenifer Troxel and Gary Troxel, Paternal Grandparents, Respondents, and
Tommie Granville, Mother, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
ORDER CHANGING OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion filed in the above case on July 28, 1997, and reported at 87 Wash.App. 131, 940 P.2d 698, be changed as follows:
At 87 Wash.App. at 137 [First column, first sentence of first full paragraph of p. 701 of 940 P.2d], the first sentence of the third full paragraph, which reads:
Accordingly, we hold that a petition for visitation under RCW 26.10.160(3) must be either contemporaneous with or preceded by a proceeding for child custody.14
shall be changed to read:
Accordingly, we hold that a petition for visitation under RCW 26.10.160(3) must be contemporaneous with a proceeding for child custody.14
/s/ COX, J.
GROSSE and ELLINGTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Visitation of Troxel, 954 P.2d 289, 1998 WL 168919 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998).
954 P.2d 289 (In Re Visitation of Troxel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Visitation of Troxel
940 P.2d 698 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1997)