In re Vincent F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Vincent F.

76 A.D.2d 527, 904 N.Y.S.2d 919

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 3, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 76 A.D.2d 527 (In re Vincent F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Vincent F., 76 A.D.2d 527, 904 N.Y.S.2d 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In an adoption proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 7, and related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated April 2, 2009, which, after a hearing, determined, inter alia, that his consent to the adoption of his child was not required.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[528]*528We have reviewed the record and agree with the father’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Desy Lee M., 44 AD3d 1046 [2007]). Covello, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an adoption proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 7, and related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated April 2, 2009, which, after a hearing, determined, inter alia, that his consent to the adoption of his child was not required.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[528]*528We have reviewed the record and agree with the father’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Desy Lee M., 44 AD3d 1046 [2007]). Covello, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 A.D.2d 527, 904 N.Y.S.2d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vincent-f-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack