In Re Villarreal

303 S.W.3d 892, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 692, 2010 WL 324541
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 2010
Docket05-10-00023-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 303 S.W.3d 892 (In Re Villarreal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Villarreal, 303 S.W.3d 892, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 692, 2010 WL 324541 (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

OPINION NUNC PRO TUNC

Opinion by

Justice FILLMORE.

Relator contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to compel arbitration. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has an adequate remedy on appeal. See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.016 (Vernon Supp. 2009); Tex. R.App. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2004) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. As a result of this ruling, relator’s Motion for Temporary Relief Pending Writ of Mandamus is MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 S.W.3d 892, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 692, 2010 WL 324541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-villarreal-texapp-2010.