In re Village of Hempstead

265 A.D. 819, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1942·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[820]*820The honesty, integrity and good faith of the Commissioner are not questioned. A judicial proceeding, however, must not be open to the slightest suspicion. Here the Commissioner at the time of his appointment and the making and filing of his oath of office was acting as special counsel in certain tax certiorari proceedings wherein the same village that instituted this condemnation proceeding was concerned. Therefore it may not be said that he is disinterested within the language of the statute; and the fact that he resigned his office as special counsel to the village after taking his oath as a Commissioner of Estimate and after objection duly made by the property owner does not remove the disqualification. Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Village of Hempstead, 265 A.D. 819, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 819 (In re Village of Hempstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Glen Cove v. Utilities & Industries Corp.
20 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. O. & W. Lines, Inc.
19 A.D.2d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)