In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas (In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00216-CV ___________________________
IN RE VIJAYARAGHAVAN RAMACHANDRAN, Relator
Original Proceeding Justice of the Peace, Precinct 2 of Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. D24-1482J2
Before Birdwell, Kerr, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the
opinion that the petition should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t
Code Ann. § 22.221; see also In re Dailey, 692 S.W.3d 480, 480–81 (Tex. 2024) (orig.
proceeding) (Young, J., concurring in denial of mandamus petition and explaining
procedural steps to complain about justice court’s rulings). Accordingly, relator’s
petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Delivered: May 13, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vijayaraghavan-ramachandran-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.