In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 13, 2025·No. 02-25-00216-CV·Published

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00216-CV ___________________________

IN RE VIJAYARAGHAVAN RAMACHANDRAN, Relator

Original Proceeding Justice of the Peace, Precinct 2 of Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. D24-1482J2

Before Birdwell, Kerr, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that the petition should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t

Code Ann. § 22.221; see also In re Dailey, 692 S.W.3d 480, 480–81 (Tex. 2024) (orig.

proceeding) (Young, J., concurring in denial of mandamus petition and explaining

procedural steps to complain about justice court’s rulings). Accordingly, relator’s

petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Delivered: May 13, 2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas (In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.