In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00216-CV ___________________________
IN RE VIJAYARAGHAVAN RAMACHANDRAN, Relator
Original Proceeding Justice of the Peace, Precinct 2 of Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. D24-1482J2
Before Birdwell, Kerr, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the
opinion that the petition should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t
Code Ann. § 22.221; see also In re Dailey, 692 S.W.3d 480, 480–81 (Tex. 2024) (orig.
proceeding) (Young, J., concurring in denial of mandamus petition and explaining
procedural steps to complain about justice court’s rulings). Accordingly, relator’s
petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Delivered: May 13, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas (In Re Vijayaraghavan Ramachandran v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.