In re Viglione

241 A.D. 615, 268 N.Y.S. 1023

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the respondent has no standing to make the motion in this proceeding to vacate the final order dissolving the marriage between the appellants. (Ruger v. Heckel, 85 N. Y. 483; Sorensen v. Sorensen, 219 App. Div. 344; Adair v. Adair, 206 id. 394; Rupp v. Rupp, 156 id. 389; Crouse v. McVickar, 207 N. Y. 213; Dodge v. Campbell, 229 [616]*616App. Div. 534; affd., 255 N. Y. 622.) Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Viglione, 241 A.D. 615, 268 N.Y.S. 1023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 615 (In re Viglione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crouse v. . McVickar
100 N.E. 697 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Dodge v. Campbell
175 N.E. 340 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
Ruger v. . Heckel
85 N.Y. 483 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)
Sorensen v. Sorensen
219 A.D. 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Dodge v. Campbell
229 A.D. 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)