In re Viglione

241 A.D. 615, 268 N.Y.S. 1023

This text of 241 A.D. 615 (In re Viglione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Viglione, 241 A.D. 615, 268 N.Y.S. 1023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the respondent has no standing to make the motion in this proceeding to vacate the final order dissolving the marriage between the appellants. (Ruger v. Heckel, 85 N. Y. 483; Sorensen v. Sorensen, 219 App. Div. 344; Adair v. Adair, 206 id. 394; Rupp v. Rupp, 156 id. 389; Crouse v. McVickar, 207 N. Y. 213; Dodge v. Campbell, 229 [616]*616App. Div. 534; affd., 255 N. Y. 622.) Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crouse v. . McVickar
100 N.E. 697 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Dodge v. Campbell
175 N.E. 340 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
Ruger v. . Heckel
85 N.Y. 483 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)
Sorensen v. Sorensen
219 A.D. 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Dodge v. Campbell
229 A.D. 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 615, 268 N.Y.S. 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-viglione-nyappdiv-1934.