In re Vidrine
72 So. 3d 345, 2011 La. LEXIS 2292, 2011 WL 4645985
Opinion
[346]*346ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
| jThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel seeks review of an order of the disciplinary board imposing a public reprimand. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find no error in the disposition of the disciplinary board.
Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the order of the disciplinary board is affirmed.
Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Vidrine, 72 So. 3d 345, 2011 La. LEXIS 2292, 2011 WL 4645985 (La. 2011).
72 So. 3d 345 (In re Vidrine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Camp
72 So. 3d 345 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2011)