In re Victoria S.

297 A.D.2d 323, 746 N.Y.2d 264, 746 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7929
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 12, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 323 (In re Victoria S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Victoria S., 297 A.D.2d 323, 746 N.Y.2d 264, 746 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

[324]*324As in Matter of Asia H. (289 AD2d 404) and Matter of Jasmine A. (284 AD2d 452), the Family Court “bootstrapped” a PINS proceeding into a juvenile delinquency proceeding through the improper employment of its contempt power to punish the appellant for her failure to comply with one of its orders (see Matter of Edwin G., 296 AD2d 7; Matter of Naquan J., 284 AD2d 1). As this Court has previously noted, such a practice is not permitted under the Family Court Act as it is presently structured (see Matter of Asia H., supra at 405; Matter of Jasmine A., supra at 453). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Jennifer G.
26 A.D.3d 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 323, 746 N.Y.2d 264, 746 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-victoria-s-nyappdiv-2002.