In re Victor D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Victor D.

11 A.D.3d 216, 782 N.Y.S.2d 255, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11513

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 216 (In re Victor D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Victor D., 11 A.D.3d 216, 782 N.Y.S.2d 255, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about January 14, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of forcible touching, sexual abuse in the third degree, and attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis to disturb the court’s determinations concerning the credibility of the victim and that of the defense witness (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about January 14, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of forcible touching, sexual abuse in the third degree, and attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis to disturb the court’s determinations concerning the credibility of the victim and that of the defense witness (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.3d 216, 782 N.Y.S.2d 255, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-victor-d-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack