In re Vessel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Vessel

128 So. 3d 997, 2013 WL 5951913, 2013 La. LEXIS 2377

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 8, 2013

DocketNo. 2013-B-2277

StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 3d 997 (In re Vessel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Vessel, 128 So. 3d 997, 2013 WL 5951913, 2013 La. LEXIS 2377 (La. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent made inappropriate comments to employees of the East Baton Rouge Parish Family Court clerk’s office. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Heidi M. Vessel, Louisiana Bar Roll number 29015, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent made inappropriate comments to employees of the East Baton Rouge Parish Family Court clerk’s office. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Heidi M. Vessel, Louisiana Bar Roll number 29015, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 3d 997, 2013 WL 5951913, 2013 La. LEXIS 2377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vessel-la-2013.