in Re Vernon Wayne Mooney, Relator

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 16, 2015
Docket07-15-00093-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Vernon Wayne Mooney, Relator (in Re Vernon Wayne Mooney, Relator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Vernon Wayne Mooney, Relator, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00093-CV

IN RE VERNON WAYNE MOONEY, RELATOR

OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

April 16, 2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Pending before the court is an application for writ of mandamus filed by Vernon

Wayne Mooney. Mooney requests us to “issue a Writ of Mandamus directed to:

Honorable, Don R. Emerson, District Judge of the 320th District Court of Potter County,

Texas. . . ordering or compelling said judge to schedule or set a trial date in cause

number 68596-D, styled the State of Texas vs. Vernon Wayne Mooney." We deny the

petition as moot.

The record at bar reflects that Mooney has been indicted for murder which has

been pending since December 2, 2010. However, according to the mandamus

application, the indictment was amended on February 24, 2014, to include three counts

for 1st and 2nd degree Injury to an Elderly Person and for manslaughter. In his application Mooney represents that he has been incarcerated for five years and has

made “six attempts, four of which were directly to the respondent, to assert his right to a

speedy trial, and to alert the court and prosecutor that he desires a speedy trial, all of

which have been routinely ignored.” Mooney contends that he received a copy of his

indictment on April 4, 2011, and began a campaign to have counsel appointed and to

have the matter set for trial. On August 15, 2013, Mooney was arraigned and counsel

was appointed. Subsequently, the indictment was dismissed and relator was re-indicted

with the aforementioned counts. According to the mandamus application, Mooney

continued to assert his right to a speedy trial without assistance of counsel.

Subsequently, counsel withdrew from representation, according to the application.

Opportunity to respond to the application was afforded the trial court. Thereafter,

the court received certified records from the district clerk of Potter County, Texas, and

the 320th Judicial District. Those records, which include a copy of a judgment, disclose

that Mooney pled guilty on Count II of the new indictment (Trial Court Cause No. 69596-

D), was sentenced on April 8, 2015, and was represented by counsel at that time. They

also reveal that the State dismissed Counts I and III. Because Mooney has received

the relief he requested in his application for a writ of mandamus, we do not address the

merits of the application.

Consequently, we grant the motion for leave to file an application for a writ of

mandamus and the application for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Vernon Wayne Mooney, Relator, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vernon-wayne-mooney-relator-texapp-2015.