In re Vere C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Vere C.

181 A.D.2d 635, 582 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 635 (In re Vere C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Vere C., 181 A.D.2d 635, 582 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Family Court, Bronx County [636]*636(Harold Lynch, J.), entered June 7, 1991, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent, upon a finding that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree, and placed him in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth, Title II, for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having threatened the victim not to return to court after the victim had reported the assault to the police, respondent was appropriately charged with intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree (Penal Law § 215.15). The statute applies where an attempt is made to force a victim to refrain from communicating information related to a criminal incident to a court, and is not limited in application to protecting victims and witnesses prior to when they attain the status of witnesses in a criminal proceeding (People v Buchanon, 176 AD2d 1001, 1002). Concur — Carro, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Family Court, Bronx County [636]*636(Harold Lynch, J.), entered June 7, 1991, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent, upon a finding that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree, and placed him in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth, Title II, for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having threatened the victim not to return to court after the victim had reported the assault to the police, respondent was appropriately charged with intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree (Penal Law § 215.15). The statute applies where an attempt is made to force a victim to refrain from communicating information related to a criminal incident to a court, and is not limited in application to protecting victims and witnesses prior to when they attain the status of witnesses in a criminal proceeding (People v Buchanon, 176 AD2d 1001, 1002). Concur — Carro, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 635, 582 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vere-c-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack