In re Verdiramo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Verdiramo

162 A.3d 291, 229 N.J. 336, 2017 WL 2603059, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 635

DecidedJune 15, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.3d 291 (In re Verdiramo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Verdiramo, 162 A.3d 291, 229 N.J. 336, 2017 WL 2603059, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 635 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-181, recommending that the motion for reciprocal discipline filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics pursuant to Rule 1:20-14 against VINCENT L. VERDIRAMO, formerly of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, be denied for lack of jurisdiction, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion for reciprocal discipline filed against VINCENT L. VERDIRAMO in District Docket No. XIV-2012-0341E, is hereby denied for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 1:20-14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-181, recommending that the motion for reciprocal discipline filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics pursuant to Rule 1:20-14 against VINCENT L. VERDIRAMO, formerly of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, be denied for lack of jurisdiction, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion for reciprocal discipline filed against VINCENT L. VERDIRAMO in District Docket No. XIV-2012-0341E, is hereby denied for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 1:20-14.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.3d 291, 229 N.J. 336, 2017 WL 2603059, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-verdiramo-nj-2017.