In Re Venuti

21 A.3d 1005, 2011 WL 2473489
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 23, 2011
Docket11-BG-517
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 A.3d 1005 (In Re Venuti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Venuti, 21 A.3d 1005, 2011 WL 2473489 (D.C. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order from the Maryland Court of Appeal sus *1006 pending respondent for six months, see Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Venuti, 418 Md. 593, 17 A.3d 143 (2011), this court’s May 13, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent filed his affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on May 19, 2011, it is

ORDERED that John Venuti, Esquire is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months, nunc pro tunc to May 19, 2011. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Charles
21 A.3d 1005 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.3d 1005, 2011 WL 2473489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-venuti-dc-2011.