In re Vento

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Vento

253 A.D. 742, 300 N.Y.S. 896, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5420

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 742 (In re Vento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Vento, 253 A.D. 742, 300 N.Y.S. 896, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Resettled order denying, on reargument, the petitioner’s application for custody of his two infant children, and awarding the custody to the respondent with right of visitation to the petitioner, affirmed, without costs. We base our affirmance on the fact that the children are very young, and the record indicates that the petitioner has no means of caring for them properly at his own home. This determination is without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to institute a new proceeding for the same relief when the children reach an age when the element of personal attention will be less important. If at that time a new proceeding shall be instituted, it will be advisable to take oral proof to determine material questions of fact. Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Resettled order denying, on reargument, the petitioner’s application for custody of his two infant children, and awarding the custody to the respondent with right of visitation to the petitioner, affirmed, without costs. We base our affirmance on the fact that the children are very young, and the record indicates that the petitioner has no means of caring for them properly at his own home. This determination is without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to institute a new proceeding for the same relief when the children reach an age when the element of personal attention will be less important. If at that time a new proceeding shall be instituted, it will be advisable to take oral proof to determine material questions of fact. Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 742, 300 N.Y.S. 896, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vento-nyappdiv-1937.