in Re: Venky Venkatraman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 3, 2022·No. 05-22-00748-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismiss and Opinion filed August 3, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00748-CV

IN RE VENKY VENKATRAMAN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-03588

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Nowell

In his August 2, 2022 petition, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing Judge Ray Wheless, Presiding Judge of the First Administrative Judicial Region of Texas, to vacate his orders denying relator’s motion to recuse and motion to reconsider and to set the motions for a hearing.

This Court lacks writ jurisdiction over Judge Ray Wheless in his capacity as Presiding Judge of the First Administrative Judicial Region of Texas, nor is our jurisdiction in jeopardy such that we could exercise writ jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(a), (b); see also In re Stone, No. 05-17-01315-CV, 2017

WL 5559232, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Nov. 16, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citing In re Hettler, 110 S.W.3d 152, 154, 155 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding) (no writ jurisdiction over presiding judge of an administrative judicial region)). Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for want of jurisdiction.

220748f.p05 /s/ Erin A. Nowell ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Venky Venkatraman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re: Venky Venkatraman (in Re: Venky Venkatraman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Hettler
110 S.W.3d 152 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)