In re Venable

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Venable

382 S.E.2d 598, 259 Ga. 386, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 328

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 27, 1989

DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 730

StatusPublished

This text of 382 S.E.2d 598 (In re Venable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Venable, 382 S.E.2d 598, 259 Ga. 386, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 328 (Ga. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

Pursuant to State Bar Rule 4-108 (a), the State Bar of Georgia has petitioned this Court for an Interim Suspension of an Attorney Pending Disciplinary Proceedings.

It appears that there are two Disciplinary Charges now pending in this Court against respondent Venable, these being Supreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 698 and 725. This petition for Interim Suspension is predicated upon the conduct complained of in No. 725.

It further appears that respondent Venable, by and through his attorney, has consented to a suspension of his practice of law until a disposition of this matter has been made.

It is therefore ordered and directed that respondent Venable be suspended from the practice of law pending the outcome of Disciplinary No. 725.

This suspension is to become effective July 27, 1989, and Glyndon C. Pruitt, respondent’s attorney, is hereby appointed to see that all of respondent’s clients are protected.

This 27th day of July 1989.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI