in Re Vangelina Ochoa
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00048-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE VANGELINA OCHOA
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Justices Hinojosa, Tijerina, and Silva Order Per Curiam
On February 3, 2022, relator Vangelina Ochoa filed a petition for writ of mandamus
through which she asserts that the trial court erred by failing to grant her motion to transfer
venue. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 155.201(b) (providing for a mandatory transfer of
venue in a matter affecting the parent-child relationship “to another county in this state if
the child has resided in the other county for six months or longer”); id. § 155.204(d)
(stating in relevant part that “a party desiring to contest the motion [to transfer venue]
must file a controverting affidavit denying that grounds for the transfer exist”). The Court
requests that the real party in interest, Gabriel C. Garcia, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of
mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 7th day of February, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Vangelina Ochoa (in Re Vangelina Ochoa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.