In re Vanessa B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Vanessa B.

38 A.D.3d 768, 830 N.Y.S.2d 914

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 A.D.3d 768 (In re Vanessa B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Vanessa B., 38 A.D.3d 768, 830 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In three related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), dated November 22, 2006, which, after a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 1027, inter alia, paroled the subject children Vanessa B., Daron N., and Derrick N. to the custody of the respondents under the petitioner’s supervision. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 29, 2006, enforcement of the order dated November 22, 2006 was stayed to the extent of remanding Daron N. and Derrick N. to the petitioner’s custody pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in connection with the underlying petitions, to be conducted as expeditiously as possible.

Under the particular facts of this case, the Family Court’s determination should not be disturbed (see Family Ct Act § 1027; Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357 [2004]; Matter of David Edward D., 35 AD3d 856 [2006]). Rivera, J.P, Ritter, Goldstein and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In three related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), dated November 22, 2006, which, after a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 1027, inter alia, paroled the subject children Vanessa B., Daron N., and Derrick N. to the custody of the respondents under the petitioner’s supervision. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 29, 2006, enforcement of the order dated November 22, 2006 was stayed to the extent of remanding Daron N. and Derrick N. to the petitioner’s custody pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in connection with the underlying petitions, to be conducted as expeditiously as possible.

Under the particular facts of this case, the Family Court’s determination should not be disturbed (see Family Ct Act § 1027; Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357 [2004]; Matter of David Edward D., 35 AD3d 856 [2006]). Rivera, J.P, Ritter, Goldstein and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.3d 768, 830 N.Y.S.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vanessa-b-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack