In re Van Wert Mach. Co.

186 F. 607, 1910 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedMarch 18, 1910
DocketNo. 13,272
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 186 F. 607 (In re Van Wert Mach. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Van Wert Mach. Co., 186 F. 607, 1910 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48 (D. Mass. 1910).

Opinion

DODGE, District Judge.

It is not disputed that Cora E. Fitz Gerald was in the bankrupt’s employ as a stenographer, at weekly wages, from January, 1907, to the date of the bankruptcy, January 11, 1908, or that the total of wages earned during that period was $983, $300 of which was earned within three months before the filing of the petition. Nor is it disputed that she received in payment from time to time, on account of wages due her, various sums ranging from 75 cents to $53.70; the first of these payments being May 4, 1907, and the others on different dates in each month thereafter, the last payment being on January 11, 1908. The payments amounted in all to $638.45. The referee holds that they have all been rightly applied upon the earlier items of the account, which will leave the $300 earned within the last three months wholly unpaid. The objecting creditor contends that the payments within three months should go to reduce the wages earned within three months. I am unable to doubt that the referee’s conclusion is right. The creditor has the right to claim that, as each payment was received, it extinguished, so far as it went, the indebtedness longest due. No directions regarding application of the payments were given by the debtor, so far as appears. It is not contended that the application which has been made results in a preference recoverable by the trustee, as in Re King Co. (D. C.), 113 Fed. 110.

The question arising upon the claim of Ernest Fitz Gerald is precisely similar. He was employed as a salesman at $20 a week, earned ■$500 in all, $260 of which came within the last three months, and he was paid on account, and at various times within the last three months, $110. I think his claim is entitled to priority to the amount of $260.

The orders of the referee are, therefore, approved and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Herbert Candy Co.
43 F. Supp. 588 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1942)
Blauvelt v. Walker
72 F.2d 915 (Fourth Circuit, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 F. 607, 1910 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-van-wert-mach-co-mad-1910.