In re Van Tuyl
This text of 28 F. Cas. 1088 (In re Van Tuyl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bankrupt having stated that he does not own the house he lives in, questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 11 and 12 are irrelevant. Question 5 is irrelevant, unless the bankrupt owns the furniture and fixtures named in it. Questions 6 and 7 are irrelevant, unless the bankrupt owns or has kept the horses and carriage referred to. Questions 8, 9, 10, and 13 on their face relate to property which is not the property of the bankrupt, and are, therefore, irrelevant. The clerk will certify this decision to the register, Isaac Dayton, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 F. Cas. 1088, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-van-tuyl-nysd-1868.