In re Van Pernis

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Van Pernis

211 Ill. 2d 654

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 2004

DocketMR 19545

StatusPublished

This text of 211 Ill. 2d 654 (In re Van Pernis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Van Pernis, 211 Ill. 2d 654 (Ill. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Mark Van Pemis, who has been disciplined in the State of Hawaii, is suspended from the practice of law for three months in the State of Illinois. Suspension effective October 15, 2004.

Respondent Mark Van Pemis shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Mark Van Pemis, who has been disciplined in the State of Hawaii, is suspended from the practice of law for three months in the State of Illinois. Suspension effective October 15, 2004.

Respondent Mark Van Pemis shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 Ill. 2d 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-van-pernis-ill-2004.