In re Van Millin

612 A.2d 975, 531 Pa. 306, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 552
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 10, 1992
DocketNo. 867 Disciplinary Docket No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 612 A.2d 975 (In re Van Millin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Van Millin, 612 A.2d 975, 531 Pa. 306, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 552 (Pa. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 1992, Van Millin having been disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated February 19, 1992; the said Van Millin having been directed on May 12, 1992, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

[307]*307ORDERED that Van Millin is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
612 A.2d 975, 531 Pa. 306, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-van-millin-pa-1992.