In re Van Dyke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Van Dyke

194 A.D.2d 241, 608 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12805

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 194 A.D.2d 241 (In re Van Dyke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Van Dyke, 194 A.D.2d 241, 608 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on December 1, 1989 and is currently in good standing. She has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept her resignation from the practice of law in New York State. Her affidavit states that she was admitted to practice in the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Maine in 1989, 1990 and 1991, respectively, that she has never practiced law in New York and that she is resigning [242]*242because she has relocated to Maine and cannot continue to pay her attorney registration fee in New York. There are currently no complaints pending against her.

Accordingly, we grant the application and direct that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on December 1, 1989 and is currently in good standing. She has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept her resignation from the practice of law in New York State. Her affidavit states that she was admitted to practice in the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Maine in 1989, 1990 and 1991, respectively, that she has never practiced law in New York and that she is resigning [242]*242because she has relocated to Maine and cannot continue to pay her attorney registration fee in New York. There are currently no complaints pending against her.

Accordingly, we grant the application and direct that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 241, 608 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-van-dyke-nyappdiv-1993.