In re Van Dam

620 A.2d 1385, 131 N.J. 434, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 64
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 4, 1993·Published

Opinion

ORDER

DAVID H. VAN DAM of PARAMUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, having pleaded guilty to violation of 18 U.S.C.A. 1014 and 2 (making a false statement to an institution insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation) and 18 U.S. C.A. 1505 and 2 (obstruction of justice), and good cause appearing;

[435] It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-6(b)(l), DAVID H. VAN DAM is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID H. VAN DAM be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID H. VAN DAM comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Van Dam, 620 A.2d 1385, 131 N.J. 434, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 64 (N.J. 1993).

620 A.2d 1385 (In re Van Dam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.