In re Van Dam

620 A.2d 1385, 131 N.J. 434, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 64
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 4, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 620 A.2d 1385 (In re Van Dam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Van Dam, 620 A.2d 1385, 131 N.J. 434, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 64 (N.J. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

DAVID H. VAN DAM of PARAMUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, having pleaded guilty to violation of 18 U.S.C.A. 1014 and 2 (making a false statement to an institution insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation) and 18 U.S. C.A. 1505 and 2 (obstruction of justice), and good cause appearing;

[435]*435It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-6(b)(l), DAVID H. VAN DAM is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID H. VAN DAM be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID H. VAN DAM comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 A.2d 1385, 131 N.J. 434, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-van-dam-nj-1993.