In re Vallery P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Vallery P.

106 A.D.3d 575, 967 N.Y.S.2d 13

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.3d 575 (In re Vallery P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Vallery P., 106 A.D.3d 575, 967 N.Y.S.2d 13 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about March 23, 2012, which, upon on a fact-finding determination, after a hearing, found that respondent father had neglected the subject child, granted custody to the mother on consent of the parties, unanimously reversed, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, the finding of neglect vacated, and the petition dismissed. Appeal from the order of fact-finding, same court and Judge, entered on or about March 23, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.

Although the issue is not preserved, we conclude the court improperly based its determination on claims of medical neglect not raised in the petition, without affording appellant father a reasonable opportunity to prepare to answer this claim (see Family Ct Act § 1051 [b]; Matter of Crystal S. [Elaine S.], 74 AD3d 823, 825 [2d Dept 2010]). Moreover, the petitioner failed to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the child was impaired or at risk of impairment by the father’s failure to seek immediate medical attention for a bump on the child’s head, which was not shown to be a significant injury (see Matter of Hofbauer, 47 NY2d 648, 655-656 [1979]; Matter of Samantha M., 56 AD3d 299, 300 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur— Tom, J.E, Acosta, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about March 23, 2012, which, upon on a fact-finding determination, after a hearing, found that respondent father had neglected the subject child, granted custody to the mother on consent of the parties, unanimously reversed, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, the finding of neglect vacated, and the petition dismissed. Appeal from the order of fact-finding, same court and Judge, entered on or about March 23, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.

Although the issue is not preserved, we conclude the court improperly based its determination on claims of medical neglect not raised in the petition, without affording appellant father a reasonable opportunity to prepare to answer this claim (see Family Ct Act § 1051 [b]; Matter of Crystal S. [Elaine S.], 74 AD3d 823, 825 [2d Dept 2010]). Moreover, the petitioner failed to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the child was impaired or at risk of impairment by the father’s failure to seek immediate medical attention for a bump on the child’s head, which was not shown to be a significant injury (see Matter of Hofbauer, 47 NY2d 648, 655-656 [1979]; Matter of Samantha M., 56 AD3d 299, 300 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur— Tom, J.E, Acosta, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.3d 575, 967 N.Y.S.2d 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vallery-p-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack