In re Valentino

856 A.2d 40, 579 Pa. 400

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 29, 2004·No. No. 306 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board [401] of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated April 27, 2004, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Mr. Justice SAYLOR dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Mr. Justice SAYLOR dissents.

In re Valentino, 856 A.2d 40, 579 Pa. 400 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

856 A.2d 40 (In re Valentino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.