in Re Val C. Fisher, Jr.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00557-CV
In re Val C. Fisher, Jr.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a pro se application for writ of habeas corpus seeking release
from confinement in the county jail while awaiting trial. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art.
17.151(1).
This Court does not have original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in criminal cases.
See Tex. Const. art. V, § 6 (providing that courts of appeals “shall have original or appellate
jurisdiction, under such restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law”); Tex. Gov’t
Code § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas-corpus jurisdiction of courts of appeals to situations
where relator’s liberty is restrained by virtue of order, process, or commitment issued by court or
judge in civil case); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05 (vesting “power to issue the writ
of habeas corpus” in “[t]he Court of Criminal Appeals, the District Courts, the County Courts, or
any Judge of said Courts”). As an intermediate appellate court, our habeas-corpus jurisdiction in
criminal matters is appellate only. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d); see also In re Wilkins, No. 03-20-00381-CV, 2020 WL 5608486, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Sept. 17, 2020,
orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want
of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
Filed: February 1, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Val C. Fisher, Jr. (in Re Val C. Fisher, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.