In Re Vaccaro
329 A.2d 555, 66 N.J. 151, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 150
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 131 N. J. Super. 264.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clieeoed and Judge COLLESTEE-7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Vaccaro, 329 A.2d 555, 66 N.J. 151, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 150 (N.J. 1974).
329 A.2d 555 (In Re Vaccaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Fasolo v. Div. of Pensions
464 A.2d 1180 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
Uricoli v. Police & Fire. Retirem. Sys.
449 A.2d 1267 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1982)
Masse v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, PUB. EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS.
432 A.2d 1339 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)
Smith v. Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension
373 A.2d 685 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Reiser v. Pension Commission, Passaic Cty.
370 A.2d 902 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
In Re Vaccaro
329 A.2d 567 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)